You are currently browsing the American Clarity weblog archives for the day 6. June 2010.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
- cultural/racial (30)
- economy (18)
- foreign policy (4)
- immigration (5)
- Islam (3)
- multiculturalism (13)
- natural law and rights (30)
- Personal (1)
- philosophy (82)
- politics (73)
- sex (4)
- Theology (40)
- Uncategorized (5)
- worldview (11)
- 29. January 2012: The wives of others (covetousness and the perils of social liberalism)
- 16. January 2012: America, Rome, and military expenditures
- 28. December 2011: Jesus: the true American Dream
- 17. December 2011: The question of peaceable assembly and local government
- 14. December 2011: The moral parameters of private lending (a case against usury)
- 3. December 2011: Why true conservatives do not attend AIDS rallies
- 23. November 2011: Sexual harassment policy in America
- 22. November 2011: Are markets intrinsically moral?
- 14. November 2011: How Jewish land reform can end American socialism
- 12. November 2011: Reexamining the laws of assault
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
Archive for 6. June 2010
Fixing the broken tax code: a simple, effective solution
6. June 2010 by admin.
Any way you look at it, Americans are overtaxed. There’s a tax for gasoline, and a tax for buying a car. There’s taxation when you get paid, and taxation when you spend. If you own a corporation, you have to pay ridiculous amounts of money for being a corporation, and if you just own a business, you have to pay taxes for unemployment funds. If you buy a home, there’s a tax, and if you just sit in your home, there’s another tax. If you’re in Washington State, you have to pay extra taxes for buying liquor and cigarettes, and if you want a carbonated beverage, you have to pay a special tax for that, too. And the taxes are for one purpose: to ensure that the things our government pays for are paid for.
Now, it’s fairly obvious to everyone that despite our massive amounts of taxation, we’re still not meeting our budgetary demands (Currently, we’re facing a yearly deficit of 1.5 trillion, on top of last year’s 1.4 trillion. To put this in perspective, our Fortune 500 only has a yearly net income of 391 billion dollars). And despite the fact that we can’t pay for everything we want, both parties keep promising tax breaks to specific people. Republicans want to tax everyone less, Democrats claim to want less taxation for the poor (a bizarre statement, since most truly poor people pay nothing in federal income taxes), and both sides use these arguments against their opponents every time an election season comes around. This is especially ironic, since our progressively mounting deficit is being met with a political demand: that the person receiving the majority’s vote never win on the promise to responsibly raise taxes across the board. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in politics, economy | Print | 3 Comments »