| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
- cultural/racial (30)
- economy (18)
- foreign policy (4)
- immigration (5)
- Islam (3)
- multiculturalism (13)
- natural law and rights (30)
- Personal (1)
- philosophy (82)
- politics (73)
- sex (4)
- Theology (40)
- Uncategorized (5)
- worldview (11)
- 29. January 2012: The wives of others (covetousness and the perils of social liberalism)
- 16. January 2012: America, Rome, and military expenditures
- 28. December 2011: Jesus: the true American Dream
- 17. December 2011: The question of peaceable assembly and local government
- 14. December 2011: The moral parameters of private lending (a case against usury)
- 3. December 2011: Why true conservatives do not attend AIDS rallies
- 23. November 2011: Sexual harassment policy in America
- 22. November 2011: Are markets intrinsically moral?
- 14. November 2011: How Jewish land reform can end American socialism
- 12. November 2011: Reexamining the laws of assault
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
Economic info every American needs to know
A lot of people are being told that Americans are getting screwed by our government’s rescue plan, but most Americans don’t really know how. To give the reader a good example of why this bailout reeks of “mismanagement,” all we’d have to do is look at banks and their excess reserves.
Now, as a little background information, every US bank dealing with more than $43.9 million is ordered by the Federal Reserve to have roughly 10% of their deposit money as reserves on hand (12). This means that if people put $100 in the bank, the bank has to have about $10 on hand and can lend the remaining $90 to other people. Allowing banks to hold only a fraction of their loaned amount on hand is known as fractional reserve banking, and it essentially allows banks to create money (something that you and I would be thrown in jail for. Check that last link out)(1)(2).
With that in mind, if one were to take a good look at a 1935 Time Magazine article, they would find that our bank reserve increase in the 1920’s –which created a credit bubble which collapsed in 1929–had only been 600 million dollars (3). At the article’s moment in 1935, American banks were holding 3 billion dollars in excess bank reserves, which meant that they could potentially create 30 billion dollars in loans, which could have torn the economy apart with rampant inflation and price bubbles similar to both of the ones we’ve experienced in the last decade. This was a serious concern back then, and it would be a concern today if we but had an active citizenry.
For those of you wondering why, have a look for yourself (4).

It looks as though after the “bailouts” we’re looking at 650 billion dollars of excess bank reserves, which means that–should Americans really get back into buying things–we’d be dealing with a problem far larger than what led to the credit collapse of 1929. After all, if they were only dealing with a 600 million dollar bank reserve increase in the 1920’s, and we’ve got a 650 billion dollar increase in the last two years, any high-schooler could do the math and realize that the ability of banks to create deposit accounts ten times our excess reserve amounts could destroy the dollar. After all, we only have a 14 trillion dollar economy according to the CIA, and those numbers are artificially high (5)(6).
So anyway, the Federal Reserve has the capability to combat inflation, and they’re probably going to be effectively raising interest rates and raising the required bank reserves to make sure that we don’t turn into Zimbabwe. But even if they were to raise those interest rates, the banks would still be holding on to that bailout money. This means the government gives our money to the banks, and then the banks can’t lend it to our poorer citizens (due to drastic interest rate increases, which would out-price many people). This, as you might notice, would put the brakes on our housing market.
Even more interesting than a rise in excess bank reserves is the fact that the excess money doesn’t exist because the banks are actually rich. The banks received this money from the government in exchange for government ownership of banking shares, essentially giving control of banking decisions to the Federal Reserve. Even more fishy than that, though? Not all of the banks were failing when they received your money. Our nine largest banks were forced into ceding control of their company to the government, under threat of CEO firings. This isn’t a bailout, it’s a power grab disguised as protection (7).
And now that our banks have been bullied into ceding control to the government, President Obama wants more control for the Federal Reserve, even though they apparently can already force banks to surrender control, and banks can’t even pay the bailout funds back without government permission (giving our Dear Leader the power to keep them under his thumb as long as he sees fit) (8)(9). And this is even despite the fact that our current economic troubles come from both over-inflation of the money supply through the Fed’s policies and government planning in the first place (10)(11).
If the president and congress were really interested in a free market like they say they are, they would be engaging in some trust-busting to keep Americans safe from companies that are “too big to fail.” Instead, what they’ve done is create executive orders which give them the power to assume complete control over large companies, which then then make forcibly larger through mergers, which benefits them while indebting you (13). So our administration isn’t only FOR the large corporations they claim to oppose, but they’re for taking control out of private hands and putting it into their own.
Place us in danger, forcefully grab control, pull the rug out from under the poor people. Politics as usual.
—————————————————–
1) Fractional reserve banking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking
2) How money is created
http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse/chapter-7-money-creation
3) 1935 Time article about excess reserves
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,848213,00.html
4) St Louis Fed: excess reserves
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?s[1][id]=EXCRESNS
5) CIA factbook: US
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/US.html
6) Our government’s fuzzy numbers
http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse/chapter-16-fuzzy-numbers
7) Nine banks forced to accept TARP money
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Documents-Paulson-forced-9-apf-15243002.html?sec=topStories&pos=5&asset=&ccode
8) Obama wants more power for Federal Reserve
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/17/politics/main5093719.shtml
9) Banks can’t give back TARP money
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tarp10-2009jun10,0,1405965.story
10) Info about when easy money became available
http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/fundsrate.htm
11) Government creates booming sub-prime industry
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html?sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
12) Reserve requirements in the US
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/supplement/2008/02/table1_15.htm
13) The Fed forces mergers
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/12/bofa-says-fed-forced-merrill-merger/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-yU7PqwEMM