You are currently browsing the American Clarity weblog archives for the day 30. May 2009.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
- cultural/racial (30)
- economy (18)
- foreign policy (4)
- immigration (5)
- Islam (3)
- multiculturalism (13)
- natural law and rights (30)
- Personal (1)
- philosophy (82)
- politics (73)
- sex (4)
- Theology (40)
- Uncategorized (5)
- worldview (11)
- 29. January 2012: The wives of others (covetousness and the perils of social liberalism)
- 16. January 2012: America, Rome, and military expenditures
- 28. December 2011: Jesus: the true American Dream
- 17. December 2011: The question of peaceable assembly and local government
- 14. December 2011: The moral parameters of private lending (a case against usury)
- 3. December 2011: Why true conservatives do not attend AIDS rallies
- 23. November 2011: Sexual harassment policy in America
- 22. November 2011: Are markets intrinsically moral?
- 14. November 2011: How Jewish land reform can end American socialism
- 12. November 2011: Reexamining the laws of assault
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
Archive for 30. May 2009
Spirituality vs. Religion
30. May 2009 by admin.
If you’ve ever heard the term “I’m spiritual, but not religious,” you’ve probably at some point wondered whether organized religion encumbers people’s spiritual lives by interfering with the individual’s Christian walk. And this is a normal thing to ask. After all, it’s absolutely true that God interacts with individuals in individual ways.
But if God proves himself through personal interaction to be morally and doctrinally inconsistent, this makes God out to be either a liar or incapable of determining truth for Himself. Either way represents a lack of the qualities necessary to make Him worthy of ultimate righteousness and thus respect. That, or people are talking to themselves.
So if it must be that God interacts with humans in a consistent manner, religion would be the result of many humans being impacted by Him, and interacting because of His divine revelations. Different stances may be taken on those revelations from His word, but this doesn’t affect whether the message–with an actual intent–was actually given, if in fact it was given. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Theology | Print | No Comments »